Give the gift of LIFE! Support the Population Research Institute!







Climate changes may exists. But it might actually benefit humanity.

As soon as the climate begins to warm, the Earth’s atmosphere begins releasing much of this energy into space. How do we know this?

Two University of Alabama scientists, Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. Danny Braswell, compared eleven years of data from the real world with U.N. climate model predictions — and found the models grossly flawed.

The study, rather pointedly called On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth’s Radiant Energy Balance, appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, Remote Sensing, in late July. (Remote Sensing. 20113, 1603-1613.)

As Dr. Spencer stated in a press release, “The [NASA Terra] satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.

Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. Danny Braswell's study supports earlier National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA data showing that humidity and cloud cover did not increase the way that the flawed U.N. computer models predicted.

The Hocky Stick Graph

Mike Mann is the author of the now famous “hockey stick” graph, which asserts that global temperatures remaining virtually fixed for centuries, then shot up in the last few decades.

The graph was questioned even by the Global Warmers themselves, one of whom wrote that “Mann is an outlier though not egregiously so.”

Top center image: Graph used by the UN Climate Panel: Note the exaggerated warming at in recent decades, which has been called into question by Climategate. Mann refused to release either his data or his algorithm for years, but the Climategate e-mails reveal an even more disturbing instance of cherry-picking data.


Bottom center image: The story involves another famous “hockey stick” graph, this one based on tree rings from Yamal, Russia. This was crafted by another CRU Global Warmer, Keith Briffa. It went on to be used in a dozen other temperature reconstructions, all of which the UN climate panel said validated Mann’s original graph. But Briffa, like Mann and his own boss, Phil Jones, for ten years refused to release the data on which he based his graph.

When Briffa’s hand was finally forced, it turned out that he had used only a tiny, biased fraction of the raw data available. When skeptic Steve McIntyre calculated a revised chronology based on more complete data, the sharp temperature increase at the end of the twentieth century simply vanished. The twentieth century now showed no significant trend. The blade of the Yamal hockey stick was gone.

Phil Jones later claimed in an e-mail to Graham F. Haughton on 27 October 2009 that:

"The claims of [Steven McIntyre] are exaggerated."

DEFUND Planned Parenthood (9)

Population control policies to combat climate change prove deadly

NOV 2019, A group of over 11,000 scientists are calling for population control measures to avoid severe human suffering from global climate change, a notion a demographer says is heavily tied to money and not actual science...

Climate Change Alarmism Results in Anti-Baby Madness:

FEB 2019, AOC believes we should stop having babies

Steven Mosher Says Poverty, Not People, is the Enemy of the Environment

OCT 2017, Mosher debunks the myth of overpopulation at International Conference of Population Control

The Earth is Not “Sick” and Mankind is Thriving as Never Before

JUL 2015, The world has reduced extreme poverty by half.

Never miss an update!

Get our Weekly Briefing! We send out a well-researched, in-depth article on a variety of topics once a week, to large and growing English-speaking and Spanish-speaking audiences.