“Catholics for Choice?” “Heretics for Choice” would be a more accurate name for these abortion lobby front groups. 6 January 2010 — Vol. 12/No. 1 Good Catholics use condoms. That is, according to the group Catholics for Choice, who blithely takes a strong stand on
When I received information concerning the upcoming Pastoral Meeting about Children and Adolescents at Risk, organized by the Latin American Episcopal Conference (CELAM), I decided to attend as a representative of the Commission of Life, Family and Childhood of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference. What made
13 April 2009 — Vol. 11/No. 11 When I received information about the upcoming “Pastoral Meeting about Children and Adolescents at Risk,” organized by the Latin American Bishop’s Conferences (CELAM), I decided to attend as a representative of the Commission of Life, Family and Childhood
Mosher played an important role in exposing the abuses associated with China’s “one-child” policy. In his latest book he tells us that China does not have a monopoly on population control-driven fanaticism and even cruelty … … What Mosher calls “costs” were not limited to
Already notorious for its unconditional embrace of abortion, the Democratic Party has now managed to adopt a position on the paramount life issue that is, if anything, even more extreme. The new platform adopted in Denver states that the Party “strongly and unequivocally supports Roe
11 August 2008 Vol. 10 / No. 32 Contraception Is Never Abortion? It Depends On What the Meaning Of “Pregnant” Is Abortion advocates are up in arms about new federal regulations to protect pro-life health care providers. According to a draft recently leaked to the
Of course, that’s not what PEP FAR really stands for. What it really stands for is the “President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.” But if pro-abortion members of the House of Representatives have their way, HIV/AIDS prevention programs will no longer emphasize abstinence and marital
18 February 2008 Vol. 10 / No. 7 Dear Colleague, It would be better if President Bush had never proposed PEPFAR, than to havethe better part of 15 billion dollars hijacked by abortion-promoting, chastity-mocking, anti-people groups like IPPF, UNFPA, and the Chinese government. If
The Mexico City Policy is under fire in Congress…again. In June, the House of Representatives, at the instigation of Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D-NY) voted 223–201 to pass a bill seeking to gut the Mexico City Policy. A Little Background on the Mexico City Policy This
23 July 2007 Vol. 9 / No. 26 Dear Colleague, The pro-abortion Congress (no surprise here) is seeking to gut the "Mexico City Policy," which prevents the International Planned Parenthood Federation and other overseas pro-abortion groups from feeding at the federal trough. But will they
“Catholics for Choice?” “Heretics for Choice” would be a more accurate name for these abortion lobby front groups. 6 January 2010 — Vol. 12/No. 1
When I received information concerning the upcoming Pastoral Meeting about Children and Adolescents at Risk, organized by the Latin American Episcopal Conference (CELAM), I decided
13 April 2009 — Vol. 11/No. 11 When I received information about the upcoming “Pastoral Meeting about Children and Adolescents at Risk,” organized by the
Mosher played an important role in exposing the abuses associated with China’s “one-child” policy. In his latest book he tells us that China does not
Already notorious for its unconditional embrace of abortion, the Democratic Party has now managed to adopt a position on the paramount life issue that is,
11 August 2008 Vol. 10 / No. 32 Contraception Is Never Abortion? It Depends On What the Meaning Of “Pregnant” Is Abortion advocates are up
Of course, that’s not what PEP FAR really stands for. What it really stands for is the “President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.” But if
18 February 2008 Vol. 10 / No. 7 Dear Colleague, It would be better if President Bush had never proposed PEPFAR, than to havethe
The Mexico City Policy is under fire in Congress…again. In June, the House of Representatives, at the instigation of Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D-NY) voted 223–201
23 July 2007 Vol. 9 / No. 26 Dear Colleague, The pro-abortion Congress (no surprise here) is seeking to gut the "Mexico City Policy," which