Blog

Welcome Baby Seven Billion!

Sometime late this year a baby will emerge from the womb of its mother, draw its first breath, and announce its arrival into the world with a tiny cry. Thus will Baby Seven Billion be born.

Everyone agrees that Baby Seven Billion's birthday—the day that our planet becomes home to seven billion human beings—marks an important milestone. But is it a milestone on humanity's upward path that we should celebrate, or a warning sign of impending catastrophe?

The prophets of doom and gloom, of population bombs and the baby booms, would have preferred that Baby Seven Billion had never been born.

We at PRI have a different take on the matter. We believe that the birth of Baby Seven Billion is cause for celebration. He or she has been born into a world that is more prosperous than our forebears could have imagined.

As our numbers have climbed so has our well-being. In 1800, when there were only 1 billion people, per capita income was a mere $100. By 1900, as the population was closing in on 2 billion, it reached $500. Currently, with 7 billion people, per capita income has soared to over $5,000. In 2100, when the population is projected to be between 7 and 8 billion (and falling), it will be $30,000 in current dollars.

Driving the so-called “population explosion” has been a real explosion in health and longevity. As late as the 19th century, four out of every 10 children died before reaching age five. Today under-five mortality is under 7 percent. Two hundred years ago, human life expectancy was under 30 years. Today it is closer to 70 years.

As people live longer, naturally there are more of us around at any given time. This is cause to celebrate, not to despair.

By nearly every measure of well-being, from infant mortality and life expectancy to educational level and caloric intake, life in Africa, Asia, and Latin America has been getting dramatically better. According to the World Bank, the average income in the developing world has more than doubled since 1960.

Enough grain is produced for every person on earth to consume 3,500 calories daily. There is no need for anyone to starve in the midst of this plenty.

Population has doubled since 1960, but world food and resource production has never been higher. Economies continue to expand, productivity is up, and pollution is declining. Life spans are lengthening, poverty is down, and political freedom is growing. Even the intractable Middle East, thought to be forever the playground of dictators and ayatollahs, is astir. The human race has never been so well off.

In fact, underpopulation, not overpopulation, is the biggest threat facing the world today. Over eighty countries representing well over half the world's population will have below replacement fertility—defined as 2.1 children per woman.

The populations of the developed nations today are static or declining. The UN predicts that, by 2050, Russia's population will have declined by 25 million people, Japan's by 21 million, Italy's by 16 million, and Germany's and Spain's by 9 million each. Europe and Japan will lose half their population by 2100.

Countries with below replacement rate fertility will eventually die out. It's just a matter of time.

Even in the developing world family size has shrunk, from around 5 children per woman in 1900 to well under 3 today. And the decline continues.

According to the UN's “low variant projection”—historically the most accurate—the population of the world will peak at 8 billion in 2040 or so, and then begin to decline.

High fertility rates are becoming rare. The UN numbers for 2008 show only a handful of countries with population increase rates at or above 3.0 percent.

By 2050, persons aged 65 and above will be almost twice as numerous as children 15 years and younger. The economic consequences of population aging will be closing schools, declining stock markets, and moribund economies.

Ignoring these facts, the population controllers continue to spread their myth of overpopulation.

The UNFPA and other population control organizations are loath to report the truth about falling fertility rates worldwide, since they raise funds by frightening people with the specter of overpopulation. They tell us that too many babies are being born to poor people in developing countries. This is tantamount to saying that only the wealthy should be allowed to have children, and is a new form of global racism.

We should stop funding population control programs, and instead turn our attention to real problems like malaria, typhus, and HIV/AIDS.

Let us also join together in celebrating the birth of Baby Seven Billion. He or she is a sign of our future, our hope and our prosperity.

People are our greatest resource. Extraordinarily gifted people have helped to enrich civilization and lengthen life spans. But the fact is, everyone, rich or poor, is a unique creation with something priceless to offer to the rest of us.

Baby Seven Billion, boy or girl, red or yellow, black or white, is not a liability, but an asset. Not a curse, but a blessing. For all of us.

Share this

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Population of the world and needs of people

Malthusian theory is/was wrong, wrong, wrong! But we need to actually go about feeding the seven billion people. We can do it too. And it's a crime and a sin not to do it. God will hold the advanced nations accountable.

The same holds true for disease in the Third Wold ,extreme poverty and misery.

Ron

I'm confused.

Human life is joyful. I will not argue with this. However, despite the fact that the world produces enough grain to feed everybody, we certainly do not distribute it well enough to do so, nor do we put it all toward food directly. A lot of grain goes to fuel cars, not to mention beef, pork, poultry, and even fish. In short, the way we use grain is inefficient, and the way we make it available to the hungry is unbalanced.
Furthermore, money does not correlate to happiness or to health. A lot of people have more money by stealing and exploiting the land and people in the undeveloped world.
Yes, if negative population growth continues, we'll all die out, but that's not the goal. Stopping and reversing population growth in the short run is a stopgap measure so that the people who are alive can get all the food and water they need and can do so sustainably, promising the same to future generations.
As for controlling population in the developing world, nobody (sane) is advocating for genocide. Merely, people all over the world should have access to reproductive education and the option of birth control. People who want babies should have them, but people who don't should have access for ways to prevent pregnancy and birth. At the same time, you are right, and we should devote resources to preventing, treating, and curing disease.
You are right again that people are our greatest resource. We will continue to use our land and resources more productively, but we must accept natural limits. Land is not infinite; oil is not infinite; water can neither be created nor destroyed, but we continue to permute it in toxic ways that take more and more resources to fix for reuse.

answer to Emily (I'm confused)

Emily gives a reasonable argument based on the information that she has been brainwashed with since birth and with which her parents were brainwashed. Having become pro-life at the age of 37, I have noticed that pro-life letters do not get published, numbers of pro-life participants in the January March for Life will be minimized and pro-choice banners will be the only cues on camera. And then, the deluge of videos which promote "Choice" and give the impression that pro-life people do not desire the advancement of women.
Uganda is the only country that has progressively reduced deaths from AIDS by promoting monogamy and chastity by billboards and public adult and teenager education. They decry condoms, which make folks feel that sex is safe enough to have an increased number of partners.
Most chemical birth control methods have the hormones estrogen and progesterone in them. Estrogenic by-products, excreted by women for the past fifty years into the world's waterways, have been accused of causing deformed life forms in these ecosystems.Progesterone is a steroid and is definitely implicated in the increased deaths of women from AIDS. Progesterone causes changes in the vaginal and cervical mucosa which makes women more susceptible to acquiring infection. Steroids can cause a number of medical problems including a decrease in immunity.The abortifacient component in birth control pills and morning after pills, may be responsible for an exponentially larger number of "silent" abortions, than the current 1.4 million surgical abortions per year in the U.S. While it is hard for most people, to empathize with an embryo as a little brother or sister, it still results in millions more humans being exempted from the future.
The worldwide economic decline has been attributed to the people deficit in up to 100 countries. In 1967, the UK passed abortion on demand laws. London was a city of 10 million people then. There were not, nor ever could be, enough hospital or clinic beds for all the abortion demand. Therefore, there were also many women showing up, in labor, from back-street prostaglandins inductions, adding to the surgical abortions done for 12 hours every Saturday and Sunday. From my experience as a student nurse, the first Planned Parenthood promise that legalized abortion would make street abortions disappear, was a false prophesy. Anyway, those kids who were destroyed then, would be forty-four years old - in the prime of their earning and spending years. American babies snuffed out in 1973, would be thirty-eight years old, working to pay for a house and a car and purchasing all the things that their grade school kids would need. Their contributions to the economy would have been enough to support the folks on social security. Now there are not enough working people to do that.
Now lets look at the other PPFA prophesies: there would be less divorce, less child abuse, less crime, less poverty. Yeah, right. These signs of social decline have also increased exponentially.
With my peers in the student nurse dorm, during the Vietnam War era, I shared the hope of less bloodshed if women ruled the world. Since 1775 to the end of the twentieth century, the number of Americans killed or wounded on the battlefield amounts to under 4 million people, while in 38 years, there have been 54 million known abortions of American children.