Tell Your Senator: Stop HHS Mandate!

February 27, 2012

Dear PRI Supporter,

The Obama administration's attack on religious liberty is intensifying.

It now claims the right, under the new HHS Mandate, to force hundreds of thousands of Catholics, working in thousands of Catholic organizations, to violate their conscience and the teachings of their faith on the Life issues.

The new Mandate is particularly alarming to us at PRI, since we exist to promote the Church's teaching on abortion, sterilization, and abortifacient contraception.

Now we are ordered to buy medical insurance that provides just such deadly services. (Abortifacient contraception and sterilization for now, with abortion lurking just around the corner.)

Obama's claim that we won't have to pay for these services because the insurance companies will pick up the tab is ludicrous. As everyone knows, the insurers will simply pass the cost along to us.

His Mandate raises another, equally important issue: If the government can define what it means to be “Catholic,” then everyone's religious freedom is at risk.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, in a letter to all American Bishops, puts it best:

In the United States, religious liberty does not depend on the benevolence of who is regulating us. It is our “first freedom” and respect for it must be broad and inclusive — not narrow and exclusive. Catholics and other people of faith and good will are not second-class citizens. And it is not for the government to decide which of our ministries is “religious enough” to warrant religious freedom protection.

Obama has decreed, in effect, that Catholic hospitals and charities, such as PRI, are not free to follow the tenets of their faith, and is seeking to impose his own immoral, anti-life agenda on them. This must not stand.

PRI calls upon every American concerned about religious liberty to immediately contact their legislators to support the Respect for the Rights of Conscience Act (HR 1179 by Congressman Jeff Fortenberry and S. 1467 by Senator Roy Blunt).

The bill could be taken up in both the House and the Senate this week. Contact your Congressman immediately and ask for his support for this legislation. If he hasn't yet co-sponsored HR 1179, ask him to do so. We must let House leadership know that Americans overwhelmingly support religious liberty.

The Senate vote is expected as early as Tuesday or Wednesday of this week. S. 1467 not only reverses the HHS Mandate, it preserves the right of insurance issuers, providers and purchasers to negotiate a health plan excluding items that are against moral and religious convictions, as well as providing conscience protection for All Americans. This legislation was introduced in early 2011, long before the HHS Mandate.

The following ten senators need to be contacted without delay:

202-224-2043 — Sen. Kent Conrad for North Dakota
202-224-2523 — Sen. Susan Collins for Maine
202-224-5344 — Sen. Olympia Snowe for Maine
202-224-5824 — Sen. Mary Landrieu for Louisiana
202-224-4041 — Sen. Joe Lieberman for Connecticut
202-224-3954 — Sen. Joe Manchin for West Virginia
202-224-6154 — Sen. Claire McCaskill for Missouri
202-224-5274 — Sen. Bill Nelson for Florida
202-224-2353 — Sen. Mark Pryor for Arkansas
202-224-2644 — Sen. Jon Tester for Montana

If you get a busy signal, call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and ask to be transferred.

If one of these Senators represents your state, it is critical that you call their office and tell them to protect religious liberty. If you have a personal relationship with these Senators, please emphasize that a vote in favor of S. 1467 is a vote to preserve religious liberty in the United States.

Also, please forward this to all of your friends and family who live in these states.

Please call and help us get the word out. This is our moment to protect the future of America for our children and our faith.

Steven W. Mosher
President, Population Research Institute

Share this


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Less access to birth control

Less access to birth control equals more unwanted/unplanned pregnancies, which leads to more abortions and/or children born to parents that cannot properly care for them, which leads to greater poverty, crime and misery. This is a good thing?! Hmmm.

As for the economics of this, insurance companies figured out long ago that it's much, much cheaper to cover a woman's birth control cost than pay for all the costs associated with an unplanned pregnancy. So actually, there is no incremental cost to policies covering contraception. In fact, what we could very well see is higher rates for plans under the Blunt amendment that exclude contraception coverage.