Bush vs. Bangkok, Abortion as 'Reproductive Health'
December 13, 2002
Volume 4/ Number 32
Going into this weeks Fifth Asian and Pacific Population Conference in Bangkok, the global abortion lobby headquartered at the United Nations expected to have it all its own way. But they have run up against a major
obstacle: The Bush Administration, which has decided that promoting economic growth in developing nations does not require reproductive health services (read: abortion). The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which has just released a report claiming that reproductive health services are the principal means of alleviating poverty in developing nations, is livid. But the Bush Administration is right. The evidence shows that birth rates are down everywhere, and population control only exacerbates poverty and hurts women.
Steven W. Mosher
Bush vs. Bangkok, Abortion as Reproductive Health
The UN Population Funds conferences are generally carefully choreographed. But the run-up to this weeks Fifth Asian and Pacific Population Conference in Bangkok has been unusually ragged.
The UNFPA received its first shock even before the conference began. The Bush Administration, acting on the principle that we should call things by their proper names, declared the phrase reproductive health services to be nothing more than code language for abortion. Which it is, of course. Back in 1994, when the Cairo International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) deadlocked over the issue of abortion, reproductive health services was adopted with a wink and a nod by the global abortion movement, which understood this as a cover for abortion. There is no doubt that the Cairo document, as it is called, includes abortion as an integral part of reproductive health services. This linguistic sleight-of-hand has been repeated ad nauseum in UN publications and at UN conferences these past eight years.(1)
The UNFPA is also appalled that the US delegation wants the phrase unsafe abortion -- double speak for legalizing abortion -- simplified to merely
abortion.(2) This much-needed change would expose, among other things, the UN Population Funds (UNFPA) promotion of manual suction abortions. Under the guise of eliminating unsafe abortion, the UNFPA ships manual vacuum aspirators around the world to treat complications of abortion, to perform uterine evacuations and menstrual regulation.(3) If, under pressure from the Bush Administration, the goal becomes eliminating abortions, then all this double talk becomes untenable.
Although upstaged at its own event, UNFPA has pressed gamely on. The Bangkok delegates have all received copies of UNFPAs latest State of the World Population report, which claims that the solution to poverty throughout the world is more funding for reproductive health
In the report, UNFPA claims that developing countries with lower fertility and slower population growth...have registered faster economic growth than countries with higher fertility and faster growth. Among the reports claims are that: Family planning programmes are social investments which attack poverty directly(5). Lower fertility at the micro (individual or family) level of society translates within a generation into potential economic growth at the macro level of society, because a greater proportion of working-age people will support relatively fewer dependents.(6) Taking advantage of the demographic window has accounted for a third of the annual economic growth of the East Asian tigers.(7) Slower population growth has encouraged overall economic development in developing nations.(8)
But these claims are nowhere supported by reliable, comprehensive economic data. Reducing population growth in the developing world through abortion and other reproductive health services may in fact have hurt economic development.
Take the example of Bangladesh, where about 25 million fewer people are in the work force today because of the family planning programs of the past few decades.(9) UNFPA would claim that this reduction in Bangladeshs potential population, from 162 million to 137 million,(10) accounted for a third of the annual economic growth of the country. But in actual fact, the major component of economic growth and development in Bangladesh since the early 1970s has been a strong workforce and a steady increase in the rate of production of Bangladeshs resources, not reproductive health
In their 2000 economic report on Bangladesh, the U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and the U.S. Department of State note that the way to sustain economic growth in Bangladesh at 7% a year is with increased production and export capacity, foreign investment, privatization, less government intervention and more political stability -- not fewer people.(12) Growth in agricultural output continues to accelerate in Bangladesh: from 5% in 1999 to 7% in 2000. Production of other goods -- fisheries, livestock and forestry -- continues to increase.(13) But more workers are needed to fulfill Bangladeshs economic potential.
The economic and export potential of Bangladesh is still not fully developed, and can only be unleashed with greater economic freedom combined with a stronger work force. Economic growth and poverty reduction have only been stunted by population reduction programs.
The same holds true for most all other developing nations, where untold numbers of families have suffered not for lack of coercive family planning programs but for lack of authentic economic development programs. Poverty has been exacerbated by the population controllers war against people.
UNFPAs report also claims that family planning programs empower individuals, especially women. Family planning programs enable choice, says UNFPA.(14)
Do UNFPA family planning programs really enable choice? Not according to the U.S. State Department. UNFPA ... facilitates the imposition of social compensation fees and the performance of abortions on... women who are coerced... to undergo abortions that they would otherwise not undergo, the U.S. State Department recently concluded. UNFPAs support of, and involvement in, Chinas population planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive
abortion.(15) According to the democratically elected Peruvian Congress, the coercive sterilization campaigns executed by the Peruvian government [under ex-President Alberto Fujimori] were induced and financed by ... the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).(16)
People are our greatest resource. Reducing the number of people of Bangladesh, and other developing nations, will do nothing to alleviate poverty or promote economic growth. On the contrary, reproductive health services abuse women and waste resources which could otherwise be invested in strengthening economies and families.
The bottom line in Bangkok is this: UNFPA wants the developed countries to cough up billions of dollars for population control. UNFPA complains that the $10.9 billion annual expenditure for reproductive health services in 2000 was $6.1 billion short. According to the United Nations blueprint, $20.5 billion is needed each year by 2010, and $21.7 billion by 2015.(17)
If the UNFPA gets its way, it will be robbing from the rich to take from the poor.
1. See: PRI Weekly Briefing, November 7, 2002 - Making Reproductive Rights (Read: Abortion) a Relic of the Past, Nov. 7, 2002. 2. See: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Canadian Population Organization Responds to Bushs Newest Attack, Nov. 8, 2002. 3. See: PRI Weekly Briefing, The Dangers of Manual Vacuum Aspiration, June 25, 2002. 4. State of World Population, 2002: People, poverty and possibilities, UNFPA, 2002. Over the past few years, UNFPAs annual reports have taken upon themselves a numbing similarity. Last year, UNFPA claimed that the worlds environment is being ruined because there are too many people on the planet, and not enough funding for family planning (State of World Population, 2001: Footprints and Milestones; population and environmental change, UNFPA, 2001); the year before that, UNFPA said the best way to protect women against violence and discrimination is more reproductive health services (State of World Population, 2000: Lives together, Worlds Apart; Men and Women in a time of change, UNFPA, 2000), and the year before that, UNFPA said the only way to save the world from overpopulation was more funding for population control (State of World Population, 1999: 6 Billion; a time for choices, UNFPA, 1999). 5. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
6. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
7. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
8. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
9. In its 2002 report, UNFPA claims that from 1972-1994, family planning programs have reduced fertility by one third. Since the early 1970s about 3.5 million births have occurred each year on average in Bangladesh, a third of which over this 22 year period is about 25 million people. 10. UN Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision, Bangladesh, p. 126. 11. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and the U.S. Department of State, FY 2001 Country Commercial Guide: Bangladesh, 2000, p. 6. 12. Ibid., U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and the U.S. Department of State. 13. Ibid., U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and the U.S. Department of State. 14. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
15. Analysis of Determination that Kemp-Kasten Amendment Precludes Further Funding to UNFPA under Pub. L. 107-115, US State Dept., July 21, 2002. 16. Subcomision Investigadora de Personas e Institutiones Involucradas en las Acciones de Anticoncepcion Quirurgica Voluntaria (AQV), Peruvian Congress, June 2002. 2. (See also: PRI Weekly Briefing, Peru: UNFPA Supported Fujimoris Forced Sterilization Campaigns, 22 July 2002, Vol. 4 / No. 17; http://www.pop.org/briefings/wb072202.htm ).
17. Ibid., UNFPA, 2002.
For more articles, click the first link in each drop-down menu, e.g. 2010 (v12).
- Weekly Briefing: Español
- La próxima batalla legislativa: el Proyecto de Ley sobre la toma de conciencia sobre el dolor
- ¿La legalización reduciría el aborto en América Latina?
- Las interrogantes de la demografía actual
- Informe de los Medios de Comunicación: Depo Provera es peligrosa para su salud.
- Canadá: una sorpresa ingrata
- Enfermeras dan el ejemplo: renuncian para no distribuir la Píldora del Día Siguiente a
- Ampliación de la Noticia: La desaparición del matrimonio
- Recordando a Reagan
- Population Research Institute expande su actividad; incorporándose en la fundación de
- Frenando la Expansión del HIV/SIDA mediante la Abstinencia (y la Doctrina Católica)
- Los Programas de Planificación Familiar de USAID merman los esfuerzos para frenar la promiscu
- Weekly Briefing: 2014 (v16)
- You Must Abort!
- “Better to be a Criminal in China than a Pregnant Mother”
- Exposing Population Control: Tanzania
- Check the pulse: An update on heartbeat legislation
- Justice Denied in Peru’s Sterilization Campaign
- On Abortion and Maternal Mortality
- Winter Games in a Wintering Nation
- PRI Takes Down Abortion-Promoting Blog
- Why the baby kidnapper shouldn’t die
- Will Spain Abolish Abortion?
- Weekly Briefing: 2013 (v15)
- Russia Chooses Life
- The Numbers Don’t Lie: Babies are Blessings for Everyone
- Controlling Women’s Desires in Kenya
- Why Do Filipino Women Die in Childbirth?
- Franchising Abortion and Sterilization
- Open response to: “Overpopulation: Should America have a one-child policy?
- What Does China Want?
- One Small Snip for Man, One Giant Snip for Mankind
- The End of America—as America
- Refugees Subject to Population Control
- Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation
- Contraception as a "Solution" to Abortion: No way!
- Cutting Foreign Aid to Save Lives
- A Crime in Time—and Again
- Catholic Relief Services Leaves Many Questions Unanswered
- Weekly Briefing: 2012 (v14)
- Will Russia Come Back to Life?
- China's one-child policy itself leads to forced abortions
- Why is Government (and Society) Discouraging Childbearing?
- UNICEF Should Rename Itself the United Nations Sex for Children Fund, or UNISEX
- America’s Pediatricians Claim the Right to Contracept Your Kids
- The Mirena IUD is Becoming More Popular - and the Lawsuits are Piling Up
- America's Depressed Birthrate
- Question: What Can we Expect From a Second Obama Administration on the Life Issues?
- Attending the Abortionists’ Annual Pep Rally
- Norplant is Back--Under a Different Name
- Sorry, Mr. Vice President, That Is Not a "Fact"
- Teenage Girl Becomes Infertile after Gardasil Vaccination
- The Contradiction of WHO
- Is Abortion Ever “Necessary?” The Evidence Says “No!”
- Of Mice and Men: New Study Touts a Male Contraceptive
- Weekly Briefing: 2011 (v13)
- Merry Christmas from PRI
- T-Shirts Are Available NOW!
- Catholic Health Care in Jeopardy
- Ban Sex Selective Abortions in the U.S.
- Pro-Life Amendment Defeated in Pro-Life Mississippi
- Baby Seven Billion, Welcome.
- Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics ... and Population Graphs
- Traditional Family Values
- We're In For A Scary Halloween (If You Listen to the Population Controllers)
- Take Good Care of Your Health Care Records - Or the Government Will!
- China's One-Child Policy Toll Reaches 400 Million
- Catholic Bishops Weigh Into Budget Debate
- Latest PRI Video Shows Collapse of Russia
- "Understanding" Joe Biden Perfects the Kowtow
- U.N. Climate Models Flawed - Grossly Exaggerate Warming Effect
- Weekly Briefing: 2010 (v12)
- Fourth Episode of Overpopulation Cartoon Series
- Turner Calls for Global One-Child Policy
- Love and HIV/AIDS
- Pope Benedict Misquoted on Condoms -- Again
- Planned Parenthood Wants to Abort Us into Prosperity
- As Elections Draw Near, PRI Releases Groundbreaking Video
- Does Obamacare Fund Abortion? Let Us Count the Ways.
- Islamic Terrorism and Fertility
- China's Thirty Years War Against its Own People Slated to Continue
- Time to Pay an "End-of-Life Visit" to ObamaCare
- PRI Updates Web Site, Releases New Video
- Radical Environmentalists Disclaim Responsibility for Eco-Terrorist James Lee
- A Farce: The UN's World Youth Conference
- After Passage of Pro-Abortion Constitution, Kenyan Bishops Urge Immediate Amendment
- The United Nations must love Catholics, we give them their best ideas.
- Weekly Briefing: 2009 (v11)
- In His Push for Socialized Medicine, Harry Reid Trashes the Hyde Amendment
- Global Warming Science? Nope, Global Warming Scam.
- Senator Max Baucus Wants to Teach Your Kids About Sex
- Blasted Ovaries: The Failure of Contraceptive Vaccines
- The Overpopulation Movement Struggles to Stay Relevant
- What's Next for the Pro-Life Movement in Health Care Reform?
- Sneak Attack on the Mexico City Policy
- Spain Awakens Against Abortion
- Merck Researcher Admits: Gardasil Guards Against Almost Nothing
- With 19 You Get Heaven
- Population Control to Combat Climate Change?
- Illegal Abortion Hot-Lines: A New Attack on the Unborn
- Obama to Seniors: Take Two Aspirin and Call Me When You're Dead
- Washington Feels the Wrath of Pro-Life Voters
- People Are The Enemy
- Weekly Briefing: 2008 (v10)
- Doug Kmiec's Departure from the Pro-Life Movement
- The Huffington Post Gets It Wrong--Again
- Abortion and Intolerance: Constants of the Left?
- China Frees Pregnant Mom after International Outcry
- Executive (Dis)Orders: Pro-life Policies Set to be Jettisoned
- Payback Time: What Planned Parenthood Expects from Obama
- Killing The Economy: Dennis Howard's "Elephant In The Living Room"
- How to Sell Out Your Country With Just One Word
- Is Immigration the Answer to the Current Economic Crisis?
- Wisconsin Offers "Free" Birth Control -- with Your Money
- USAID Denies Funding to Abortion Group Implicated in Forced Abortions and Sterilizations in China; PRI Applauds Action
- A New Front in the Abortion Wars
- Cyclebeads: The UNFPA Discovers Natural Family Planning, Sort Of
- Sarah Palin, An American Original
- "Kids: Your Time Is Up" -- Global Warming Game Targets Vulnerable Youngsters
- Weekly Briefing: 2007 (v09)
- Preserving Parental Rights in Panama
- Saving the Mexico City Policy
- How Family Planning Programs Cause Sex-Selective Abortion, Female Infanticide, and Other Forms of Ch
- Patrick Carroll's Research and the ABC Link Debate
- What Women Want (Hint: Not Reproductive Health Care)
- Fighting for Our Rights
- Reproductive Health Mortality
- House Democrats Stage Hearing on the Mexico City Policy
- Gender Equity and the Demeaning of Men's Issues
- The Obstetric Fistula Fallacy
- Chimeras, Great Britian, and the Brave New World
- Are There Too Many Columbians
- US Bishops Issue a New CALL to Latinos
- HillaryCare, 2.0
- HIV/AIDS: Western Failure and Ugandan Success
- Weekly Briefing: 2006 (v08)
- Irish Exceptionalism at an End?
- Suicide of the West?
- 300 Million and Immigration: Separating the Issues
- A Cut for Population Control Money?
- 300 Million, Social Security, and Solvency
- Pro-Life Politics
- The Small Problem of Suburban Sprawl
- Three Hundred Million and Counting
- Abortion the Cheap Easy Way
- Life in the News
- Restricting Women's Rights
- FDA Prepares Sell-Out on MAP
- Senate Democrats'Make-Believe on Girls' Abortions
- Kinder, Gentler Genocide in Mongolia
- World Population Aging 2006
- Weekly Briefing: 2005 (v07)
- What Mexican Women Want
- Will making pregnancy profitable save Italy from demographic destruction?
- House Takes an Interest in the RU-486 Poison Pill
- Getting U.S. Out of Abortion
- Time for a RU-486 Rollback
- A Feast for Life
- More Smiles for Scalito
- Abuse of Chinese Women and Children
- France's End
- Smiles for Scalito
- Abortion Doubters at the Washington Post?
- Mostly the Same, But UNFPA Discovers Fatherlessness
- UN AIDS Envoy Cant Stomach Abstinence
- Living the Gospel of Life Down Under
- Pro-Abortion Court Revolution Targets Colombia
- Weekly Briefing: 2004 (v06)
- Unlike Europe's, U.S. Population Continues to Grow--And in the Right Places
- Abortion by Other Means
- China's Persecution of Women and Children: More of the Same
- Canada Cuts off Chinese Women's Freedom in Order to Spite America's Face
- Would Legalization Reduce Abortion in Latin America?
- The Conscience Protection Amendment and NARAL's "D"
- The Abortion Pill Can Kill Mothers, Too
- Will Families Benefit from Tax Reform?
- The Unacceptable Arlen Specter
- How to Reduce the Number of Abortions (Hint:
- UNICEF: The Mask is Off!
- Secularism's Demographic Conundrum
- Despite Bumper Harvests, Lester Brown's Sky is Still Falling
- Peruvian Congress could punish prolife congressmen.
- Media Reports: Depo Provera Is Hazardous to your Health
- Weekly Briefing: 2003 (v05)
- Exposing Domestic Abortion Strategies
- New Revision Points to Underpopulation Crisis
- PRI needs your help for continued success in 2004
- The Coming Demographic Victory
- In Thanksgiving to God for People
- People: the Greatest Unmet Need
- Gates, Microsoft Urged by Shareholders to Cease Making Charitable Contributions
- President Bush Signs Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003
- The BBC's Method of HIV/AIDS Prevention
- Judge Robert Bork in Lincoln Nebraska
- USAID-funded FHI Exploits Women
- Population Control on our Shores
- The Two Sides of the Culture of Death
- Secretary Powell Cuts $25 Million More from UNFPA
- USAID Undercuts U.S. Global HIV/AIDS Initiative
- Weekly Briefing: 2002 (v04)
- Casting Lotts and Throwing Stones in the U.S. Congress
- Bush vs. Bangkok, Abortion as 'Reproductive Health'
- UK Pro-Aborts Seek to CHANGE Peruvian Health Policy
- UNFPA Seeks Drinking Friends to Fund Forced Abortion
- Condom Kingdom Deflated by Failure (Are You Listening, Bill?)
- USAID "Shifts" Focus to More Aggressive Population Policy for the Philippines
- Making "Reproductive Rights" (Read: Abortion) a Relic of the Past
- Broken Promises: Reproductive Rights Agenda Betrays Women and Children
- EU to Increase UNFPA Funding? Not so Fast!
- UNFPA Admits it Has No Way to Monitor China's Forced Abortion Population Program
- Graduating Countries from Population Control
- Foreign Aid in a Grown Up World
- ABOUT FACE: Norplant Victim Sues Wyeth, OBGYN for $120 Million
- How to Save Lives with $34 Million
- Project Afghanistan: A Situation Report
- Weekly Briefing: 2001 (v03)
- Urgent Action Alert! Call on President Bush to Zero-Fund UNFPA
- UNFPA Whitewashes Forced Abortion in China
- Hillary Clinton Forces Abortion Rights Agenda on Afghan Women
- Pro-Family Groups Condemn UNFPA
- Abortion Zealots Threaten Afghan Women
- Muslims Shocked by Western-led 'Genocide' in Refugee Camps
- UNFPA Hides Coercion Behind a Green Front
- An open letter from Steven W. Mosher to Thoraya Obaid, Executive Director of the United Nations Popu
- PRI Investigation of UNFPA Prompts Hearing on Forced Abortion in China
- UNFPA Supports Coercive Family Planning—Including Forced Abortion—In China (and PRI Has
- Abortion Group Targets Vulnerable Victims of Terror
- China's Role in Osama bin Laden's 'Holy War' On America
- America's Frozen Population
- What African Women Want (not "Reproductive Health Care")
- About Face
- Weekly Briefing: 2000 (v02)
- What the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link Means for Women in the Developing World
- Executive Orders to Save Lives
- Heedless of Demographic Dangers, Beijing Pushes Ahead with One-Child Policy
- Amend U.S. China Policy
- United in Opposing People
- RU 486 and Our Ties to China
- Abortion and Population Control
- Drowning Babies in Dollars
- AIDS and Population Control In Africa
- Family Planning Costs Lives
- Another Country
- Population Growth and its Enemies
- Immigration verus Population Control
- Land of the Setting Sun
- The Ordeal of Chinese Mothers Continues: New Evidence of Massive Female Infanticide
- Weekly Briefing: 1999 (v01)
- Planned Giving
- Depopulation Strikes New England
- Albright Scrambles to Appease Population Control Allies
- Wei Jingsheng Calls for Democracy in America
- UNFPA Bribes Kosovo Gynecologist
- Chinese Freedom Fighters to Meet at Historical Summit Conference
- Population Control and the New Global Racism
- Welcome Baby Six Billion!
- UNFPA Spokesman Lies About Milosevic Partnership to Preserve US Funding
- Know Your Rights!
- Feminist Rights Agenda Storms United Nations
- When Family Planning Is Ethnic Cleansing
- New York Post Faults UN Agency for Ethnic Cleansing of Albanians
- Reversing Itself, UNFPA Admits Ties to Milosevic Regime
- Disney Continues to Propagandize 'Myth of Overpopulation' in Public Schools